<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Full-Auto Shotgun From SRM Arms	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.armoryblog.com/firearms/shotguns/full-auto-shotgun-from-arm-arms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.armoryblog.com/firearms/shotguns/full-auto-shotgun-from-arm-arms/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 08:15:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jimbo		</title>
		<link>https://www.armoryblog.com/firearms/shotguns/full-auto-shotgun-from-arm-arms/comment-page-1/#comment-85925</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jimbo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 08:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.armoryblog.com/?p=3501#comment-85925</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Full auto is grossly unnecessary in a shotgun and the need to rotate the magazine renders the design even less suited for fully automatic usage than a more conventional box or drum magazine setup.

But I can see its appeal as a PR thing, to COD fanboys and the like. Just doesn&#039;t seem like an audience worth pandering to sometimes though.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full auto is grossly unnecessary in a shotgun and the need to rotate the magazine renders the design even less suited for fully automatic usage than a more conventional box or drum magazine setup.</p>
<p>But I can see its appeal as a PR thing, to COD fanboys and the like. Just doesn&#8217;t seem like an audience worth pandering to sometimes though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>