<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" > <channel> <title> Comments on: Full-Auto Shotgun From SRM Arms </title> <atom:link href="https://www.armoryblog.com/firearms/shotguns/full-auto-shotgun-from-arm-arms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /> <link>https://www.armoryblog.com/firearms/shotguns/full-auto-shotgun-from-arm-arms/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 08:15:31 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod> hourly </sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency> 1 </sy:updateFrequency> <item> <title> By: Jimbo </title> <link>https://www.armoryblog.com/firearms/shotguns/full-auto-shotgun-from-arm-arms/comment-page-1/#comment-85925</link> <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jimbo]]></dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 08:15:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.armoryblog.com/?p=3501#comment-85925</guid> <description><![CDATA[Full auto is grossly unnecessary in a shotgun and the need to rotate the magazine renders the design even less suited for fully automatic usage than a more conventional box or drum magazine setup. But I can see its appeal as a PR thing, to COD fanboys and the like. Just doesn't seem like an audience worth pandering to sometimes though.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full auto is grossly unnecessary in a shotgun and the need to rotate the magazine renders the design even less suited for fully automatic usage than a more conventional box or drum magazine setup.</p> <p>But I can see its appeal as a PR thing, to COD fanboys and the like. Just doesn’t seem like an audience worth pandering to sometimes though.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>